Graduation Rate Comparison
No information available for the schools.
| Name | Graduation Rate (Men/Women) | Completers (Men/Women) | Candidates (Men/Women) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exton | No completers information available at the school. | ||
| Warminster | No completers information available at the school. | ||
| Average | 0.00% (0.00% / 0.00%) |
0 (0 / 0) |
0 (0 / 0) |
Transfer-out Rate Comparison
No information available for the schools.
| Name | Transfer-out Rate (Men/Women) | Transfer-out (Men/Women) | Total Students (Men/Women) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exton | No transfer-out information available at the school or no students transferred out. | ||
| Warminster | No transfer-out information available at the school or no students transferred out. | ||
| Average | 0.00% (0.00% / 0.00%) | 0 (0 / 0) |
0 (0 / 0) |
Retention Rate Comparison
The average retention rate of Automotive Training Center Campuses is 68.00% for full-time students and 100.00% for part-time students. Retention rate is the percentage of a school's first-time, first-year undergraduate students who continue at that school the next year (Sophomore year). The following table compares the retention rates between Automotive Training Center Campuses.
Among the Automotive Training Center Campuses, Warminster has the most highest retention rate of 69%, while Exton has the lowest rate of 67%.
| Name | Full-time | Part-time |
|---|---|---|
| Exton | 67% | 100% |
| Warminster | 69% | - |
| Average | 68.00% | 100.00% |
Top Colleges By Subject
- Tightest Schools To Admit (Lowest Acceptance Rate)
- Affordable Schools To Admit (Highest Acceptance Rate)
- Most Favored Schools (Highest Yield)
- Colleges with Low Yield
- Expensive Colleges (Highest Tuition & Fees)
- Inexpensive Colleges (Lowest Tuition & Fees)
- Colleges with Most Students
- Colleges with Least Students
- Colleges with Most Online Students
- Colleges with Least Online Students
- Colleges with Highest Graduation Rates
- Colleges with Lowest Graduation Rates
- Low Student to Faculty Ratio
- High Student to Faculty Ratio