Total Student Population Comparison
The total student population of selected colleges is 425 with 389 female students and 36 male students. This enrollment statistics is based on the latest data from IPEDS, U.S. Department of Education for academic year 2024-2025. The following table compares the student population for both undergraduate and graduate schools between selected colleges.
Among the selected colleges, Valley College-Beckley has the most enrolled students of 165, while Charleston School of Beauty Culture has the least number of students of 46 for both in graduate and undergraduate programs.
| Name | Total | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston School of Beauty Culture | 46 | 13 | 33 |
| Morgantown Beauty College Inc | 68 | 2 | 66 |
| Valley College-Beckley | 165 | 4 | 161 |
| West Virginia Junior College-Bridgeport | 146 | 17 | 129 |
| Mountain State College | Enrollment information is not available. | ||
| ITT Technical Institute-Huntington | Enrollment information is not available. | ||
| Total | 425 | 36 | 389 |
Undergraduate Student Population
The total undergraduate population of selected colleges is 425 with 389 female students and 36 male students. The following table compares 2024-2025 undergraduate enrollment between selected colleges.
Among the selected colleges, Valley College-Beckley has the most enrolled undergraduate students of 165, while Charleston School of Beauty Culture has the least number of undergraduate students of 46.
| Name | Total | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston School of Beauty Culture | 46 | 13 | 33 |
| Morgantown Beauty College Inc | 68 | 2 | 66 |
| Valley College-Beckley | 165 | 4 | 161 |
| West Virginia Junior College-Bridgeport | 146 | 17 | 129 |
| Mountain State College | Enrollment information is not available. | ||
| ITT Technical Institute-Huntington | Enrollment information is not available. | ||
| Total | 425 | 36 | 389 |
Graduate Student Population
The total graduate population of selected colleges is 0 with 0 female students and 0 male students. The following table compares 2023-2024 graduate enrollment between selected colleges.
| Name | Total | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mountain State College | Enrollment information is not available. | ||
| ITT Technical Institute-Huntington | Enrollment information is not available. | ||
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Distance Learning (Online Class) Enrollment
The following table compares 2023-2024 distance learning enrollment for both undergraduate and graduate programs between selected colleges. In undergraduate programs, out of total 311 students, 67 students (21.54%) have taken courses only through distance learning and 217 students (69.77%) have learned from at least one online course.
| Name | Undergraduate | Graduate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Online Exclusively | Some Online Classes | Total | Online Exclusively | Some Online Classes | |
| Charleston School of Beauty Culture | Charleston School of Beauty Culture does not offer online courses. | |||||
| Morgantown Beauty College Inc | Morgantown Beauty College Inc does not offer online courses. | |||||
| ITT Technical Institute-Huntington | no longer opens and does not accept applicants (Closed: 09/03/2016) | |||||
| Valley College-Beckley | 165 | - | 165 (100.00%) | No Graduate Level Courses Offered | ||
| West Virginia Junior College-Bridgeport | 146 | 67 (45.89%) |
52 (35.62%) | No Graduate Level Courses Offered | ||
| Average | 311 | 67 (21.54%) |
217 (69.77%) |
0 | 0 (0.00%) |
0 (0.00%) |
Top Colleges By Subject
- Tightest Schools To Admit (Lowest Acceptance Rate)
- Affordable Schools To Admit (Highest Acceptance Rate)
- Most Favored Schools (Highest Yield)
- Colleges with Low Yield
- Expensive Colleges (Highest Tuition & Fees)
- Inexpensive Colleges (Lowest Tuition & Fees)
- Colleges with Most Students
- Colleges with Least Students
- Colleges with Most Online Students
- Colleges with Least Online Students
- Colleges with Highest Graduation Rates
- Colleges with Lowest Graduation Rates
- Low Student to Faculty Ratio
- High Student to Faculty Ratio